← All posts

Up to 300 places a year, no employer needed: what the proposed Catalyst Visa could mean for Ugandan talent

News · 2026-09-25 · 4 min read

Imagine moving to New Zealand without first finding an employer to sponsor you. That is the idea behind the "Catalyst Visa" proposed by a New Zealand growth advocacy organisation. It would admit up to 300 highly accomplished professionals each year. For founders and senior specialists in Kampala or Entebbe it is an interesting signal, but it is a proposal only, and nobody can apply today.

The shift in philosophy

Today most New Zealand work visas hinge on an employer who identifies a gap, offers a role and sponsors the visa. The Catalyst proposal would invite people proactively, based on a demonstrated history of building companies, raising significant investment, commercialising research or leading high-performing technical teams. The target is capability that does not yet exist locally at scale, such as strategic product management, which advocates say is still maturing in New Zealand's tech sector compared with larger markets.

Freedom now, conditions later

1. Arrive without a job offer or employer sponsor.
2. Begin relevant work within a year of arrival.
3. Stay in qualifying roles for three years before becoming eligible for residency.

In exchange, holders could be self-employed, launch a venture or take several advisory roles across companies. The existing employer-sponsored route ties a migrant's status to a single employer from the first day, which rules out that flexibility. A route that does not require a binding commitment before the move lowers the risk for both the person and the country.

How it compares

Proponents argue that 300 is a deliberately cautious cap. If scaled to population as comparable schemes in the UK or US are, New Zealand's equivalent would sit closer to 900 places a year. About 40,000 to 50,000 Accredited Employer Work Visas are issued annually, so 300 would be a small, targeted addition. The UK, Australia, Singapore and the US all run some version of an exceptional-talent visa already.

Timing may help the idea. Skilled professionals in major tech hubs increasingly weigh quality of life and geopolitical stability alongside salary, and New Zealand's safety, natural environment and family-friendly reputation are being cited more often as pull factors.

What a Ugandan professional can do now

If adopted, the visa would sit alongside existing skilled and business categories. Eligibility would probably depend on proof of outcomes, such as capital raised, companies scaled, teams built or products launched, judged by an independent panel instead of a points system. Begin gathering that proof now: contracts, funding records, product dates and references. A CV that states outcomes plainly will help, so consider Build AI CV, and a short introduction video on SelfIntroVideo can show how you present yourself.

Keep other basics ready. Your UNEB results, degree transcripts and Directorate of Industrial Training (DIT) certificates may be assessed for any route, and a Ugandan qualification never automatically equals a New Zealand registration or licence. Interpol police clearance is requested when a visa asks. For New Zealand advice use a licensed immigration adviser or a lawfully exempt person, and for Australia a migration agent on the MARA register.

Related reading: what the AI shake-up means for skilled migrants and New Zealand's tech talent gap. Real roles are on our jobs page.

Why this matters even before it exists

Even as an idea, the proposal shows where competition for talent is heading. Countries are no longer waiting for a vacancy; some are inviting people directly. If you are building a career in Uganda, that is a reason to keep your achievements documented as you go, not in a rush when an announcement is made. A habit of recording results every quarter costs little and helps in every future application.

Common mistakes Ugandan applicants make

• Assuming a proposal will become a visa on a set date.
• Counting titles instead of outcomes.
• Paying for early access to a scheme that does not exist.
• Forgetting that existing routes need preparation too.

Frequently asked questions

Who proposed the Catalyst Visa?

A New Zealand growth advocacy organisation, not the government.

Is 300 a lot?

It is small next to 40,000 to 50,000 Accredited Employer Work Visas a year.

Would self-employment be allowed?

Yes, along with launching a venture or taking several advisory roles.

Would it replace other visas?

No. It would sit alongside existing categories.

Key takeaways

• The Catalyst Visa is a proposal for up to 300 places a year.
• No job offer or sponsor would be needed, but conditions would follow.
• Evidence of outcomes would count most.
• Prepare now and rely on licensed advice.

#catalyst visa proposal #uganda #new zealand immigration #founders #exceptional talent